Sponsored by:

GFi MailEssentials
Hosted Spam Filtering
30 day trial FREE!


Home
About Spam
Help for Users
Help for Sysadmins
Help for Marketers
FAQS
Join Us
Link to Us
Site Index
About Us
Editor's Blog

Promote Responsible Net
Commerce: Fight Spam!
Fight Spam with Anti-spam Software for Exchange Server, now try it for 30days for FREE!

The receiver pays for spam

We can't emphasize this strongly enough - the receiver pays for the spam, not the sender. "Well," you might argue, "the receiver doesn't really pay any money, because they have a flat-rate ISP account."

But, that's not true. The big online services have metered rates, and so do many ISPs. Furthermore, in some major cities in the U.S., all phone calls, even local ones to an ISPs dial-in modems, are metered.

On top of that, the spammers are exporting the problem to Europe, Australia, Asia, South America and Africa. Many countries around the world have no flat-rate services whatsoever, and in Europe, for example, phone rates are often much higher than in the U.S.

No matter how you stretch to justify it, the recipients of spam are getting the shaft from spammers.

Back to Why spam is bad.


Scott Hazen Mueller / E-mail me