Sponsored by:

GFi MailEssentials
Hosted Spam Filtering
30 day trial FREE!

About Spam
Help for Users
Help for Sysadmins
Help for Marketers
Join Us
Link to Us
Site Index
About Us
Editor's Blog

Promote Responsible Net
Commerce: Fight Spam!
Fight Spam with Anti-spam Software for Exchange Server, now try it for 30days for FREE!

Bulk unsolicited email

Eventually, spam will be a legal problem. Our notions had better be ones that the legal system will support. The courts tend to frown on things that look like the government regulating speech: to say that it is *commercial* speech that we want regulated could run afoul of that. (OTOH, the courts have *also* tended to treat commercial speech as less privileged than other forms of speech....) Anyway, we need to focus on the two factors that are relevant:

*bulk* e-mail. Whatever we may think about the content, one's and two's of e-mail just aren't anything more than annoyances, if they're even that -- they're just the price of having a mailbox: sometimes you'll just have to cope with mail you don't want. Thus one requisite for censure is that the mailer does *bulk* mailing.

However, that's not enough. The net is about communication -- and people will regulate their own reception of mail, one way or another, *provided* that they're given the opportunity. *Unsolicited* e-mail bypasses the opportunity and bulk unsolicited e-mail has the real capacity of making people's use of e-mail impossibly expensive, in terms of money and time.

Thus, I would say, that we must focus on *bulk* *unsolicited* e-mailing; other factors, such as content, are secondary.

And, just to point out that the flyer analogy is not irrelevant, do we *really* want to, by restricting ourselves to *commercial* mail, effectively sanction the Crusader spammage? Or the rape and snuff spammage? Or, what happens when the Church of Scientology decides to exploit that medium....?

T. William Wells